The Mamlorn Forest Dispute

Finglen Sheiling, Mamlorn Forest

In the 1730s a dispute arose between the Earl of Breadalbane and the (new) feuars of estates in Glenlyon over grazing rights in the Forest of Mamlorn, a Royal Forest that covered land approximately 37 km2 at the head of Glenlyon and Glenlochay. The dispute exemplifies the conflicts that arose over the use of upland resources that were previously regarded as marginal in an age when agricultural production and estate management were becoming more and more commercialised.

The Earl was Keeper of the Royal Forest, and new landholders in Glenlyon, Menzies of Culdares and a feuar of two fermtouns, MacDonald of Kenknock, began to push the limits of his tolerance by intensifying their tenants’ grazing in sheilings on the north side of the forest. Culdares also rented some pastures out to drovers. This opened a legal can of worms, as the boundaries of the feuars’ properties and the Forest were in dispute and there was limited documentation to clarify the extent of the territories in dispute.

At this time, Highland lords were more prone to legal rather than military action to resolve disputes, but even so there were armed stand-offs between Glenlyon tenants and Earl’s foresters. Each side argued robustly for their rights, and in the course of the dispute exposed attitudes towards land ownership and assumptions of rights that illustrate both the long standing challenge for Gaelic chiefs to align the Duthchas (traditional lands and rights) of their clan with their Oigreachd (charter-based ownership and rights), and also the increasing pressure on lords to maximise the commercial return on land to support increasingly expensive lifestyles.

The dispute rumbled on for more than a decade and was heard no less than three times in the House of Lords. Both sides employed a range of tactics and arguments and at times the dispute appears to have been particularly bitter, despite long standing generally good relations between the tenants of Glenlyon and Glenlochay and the Earl’s foresters.

You can read more about the dispute in my paper presented to the Ruralia XIII conference at the University of Stirling and recently published in the conference proceedings, Seasonal Settlement in the Medieval and Early Modern Countryside, Edited by Piers Dixon and Claudia Theune: This piece of singular bad neighbourhood: the Mamlorn Forest Dispute, Scotland,c. 1730-1744.

Coireach a’ Bà

On a recent trip from Glasgow to Ballachulish I was able to stop for a quick photo of Coireach a’ Bà, the corrie that gave its name to the deer forest now known as the Blackmount (or Black Mount).

Viewed from the East, Meall Tionail (the mound of assembly), is clearly visible in the centre of the corrie), with the slopes of Sròn nan Giubhas (the nose/promontory of the pine) to the left and Clach Leathad (stony hill) to the right.

This picture was taken in early February, in relatively mild weather. When Scandaver, the King’s forester, came here in the winter of 1621/22 the conditions were much more severe. Having completely underestimated the challenge of capturing an unenclosed red deer on Rannoch Moor in winter, he retreated, though further hairbrained plans were hatched to capture the white hind that the Earl of Mar had reported to the King.

For more on Scandaver’s misadventure and the forest of Coireach a’ Bà, see my post on the White Hind.

The mound of assembly was a common feature of early deer forests, and indicated a gathering point at which the beaters would herd the deer before driving them towards the hunters.

He sall not burn a blase…

Trawling through the Glenorchy Baillie Court records can, on occasion turn up a gem, such as this, from 1632:

The original entry in the Court Book of Discher and Toyer, GD112/17/6, National Records of Scotland.

Jon Campbell elder in portbane caution for his sone duncane Campbell in 
Croftgarrow [?] that he sall not burne a blase schuit a wasp speare nor put 
out a wand on any p[ar]t of the water of Tay here[a]ft[er] under the pane of jc lib for ilk failzie toties quoties

(National Records of Scotland, GD112/17/6, folio 140)

This entry, by no means the shortest in the court book for the period, holds a wealth of information to be unpacked.

John Campbell is acting as Cautioner for his son Duncan: this was a common legal instrument in the period and is, essentially, a form of financial guarantee for future good behaviour. We can assume from the case that Duncan has been reported to be fishing (for salmon) without permission. Rather than prosecute, the court has secured an undertaking from a relative (in this case the father) as a form of surety. This means John will be liable to the court for £100 Scots (“jc lib“) for each future infringement committed by his son (“ilk failzie toties quoties“) .

Such a sum indicates that a) Duncan was a persistent offender and b) that he and his family were of some financial substance. John is likely a principal tenant or even a tacksman.

John’s residence, Portbane, is not marked on modern maps but is possibly a settlement on the Tay river system. Duncan is a resident of Croftgarrow – the only modern day place name that corresponds is in Fortingall parish, rendered in older maps as Croftgarbh. It may be that Duncan was operating his illicit fishing operation from there down the River Lyon to the Tay.

The entry also indicates three technologies Duncan was alleged to have used:

He was not to “burne a blase”. This refers to the practice of “burning the water”. A burning torch was used to attract the salmon which would then be speared. This could be done from a small boat by a team of two or more, or, in shallow water, by wading. (Hendry 1982, pp 19).

Thomas Scott, 1895, Salmon Leistering on the River Tweed. Watercolour on paper. Scottish National Gallery of Modern Art Aquisition Number D 5139

This technique was connected to the next technology, a “wasp speare”, a salmon spear or leister. These were normally multi-pronged spears that resembled tridents (though often with more tines). A wasp spear or wawsper could be used when burning the water, or on its own during daylight hours.

Finally, Duncan is prohibited from “setting out a wand”, or fishing rod. Duncan was clearly an enthusiastic and persistent salmon poacher.

There is no indication in the entry whether he also set nets (with license) or whether his activities had been reported by other fishers on the river.

References:

Hendry, C C (1982), Scottish Poaching Equipment, HMSO Edinburgh

National Records of Scotland General Depositions (GD) 112 The Breadalbane Muniments

Kilmartin grave slab hunting scene

Two dogs attack a stag on this Kilmartin grave slab (detail)

There is an excellent collection of late medieval grave slabs in the graveyard of Kimartin Church, Argyll, dating from the 13th to the 16th centuries, with the majority dating from the 14th and 15th, most in the style of the Loch Awe school. Some are scattered through the graveyard, whilst two groups have been collected, one in the Poltalloch enclosure and the other in a lapidarium established in 1956 through the roofing of an extant stone-built enclosure.

Within the lapidarium collection, slab 6 includes the panel pictured above, which sits at the base of the slab:

The Dalriada Project has undertaken a desk based assessment of the monuments within the graveyard and provides this description:

Tapered slab with slightly pointed head, l.76m by 0.53m, with triple margin as
on number 10. A 0.45m armed figure, of conventional type but with feet turned to the right, stands in a dragon-headed niche with plant-stem pillars. In the lower half there are an opposed griffon and a dragon, and then two long-eared cat-like beasts whose hind-legs are linked to plantstems surrounding a stag and two hounds.
Loch Awe school, 14th-15th century
(1)

Hunting motifs do appear occasionally on such slabs, though they are not as common as mythical beasts and the ubiquitous swords and armed figures. This particular image clearly depicts the stag being attacked by the hounds. Dogs were of course central to deer hunting in the Middle Ages, and without further context it is difficult to say whether this depicts a kill after coursing (in which a small number of dogs quickly run down the deer), or if the dogs may be understood to be part of a larger pack. There is also evidence from later hunting literature (such as Duncan Ban Macintyre’s poetry) that stalking often ended with dogs running down an injured deer. It’s even possible that contemporary viewers might understand this to have been part of the slaughter at the end of a tinchell, or deer drive.

The dogs do not seem to be large enough to be the breed described David Leslie as “gretter than ane tuelfmoneth alde calfe; and this sorte cowmonlie huntis the gretter beistes, as ye sail sie, athir the harte or the wolfe” and are perhaps the second type he listed in his Historie of Scotland: “sumthing lesse than is this, bot mair couragious than he and nobilar of kynde, a beist of a meruellous audacitie and suiftnes, that nocht onlie oft tymes vses to invade wylde beistes, bot evin the sam men willinglie be the instinctione of nature he vses to invade quhome he perceiuet to do ony skaith to his maistiris & Leidaris”. (2)

References

  1. Kilmartin House, Dalriada Project (2009), Kilmartin Graveyard Desk Based Assessment
  2. Scottish Text Society (1888) David Leslie, Historie of Scotland, (translated into Scots, 1596 by Fr Dalrymple), p20

A fox “bield”

Not a Scottish post. In Cumbria, where there was and is a very strong tradition of dry stone walling, I was introduced to the structure pictured below, situated above a crag in Eskdale.

Fox bield at Hare Crags, Eskdale (Photo: Jon Read, 2021)

These structures seem to have been prevalent in the north west of England, and possible pre-date the widespread hunting of foxes with hounds. There is some confusion over nomenclature (“bield” means shelter, or assistance in northern English dialects and Scots) and some early writing on these structures may have confused “borrans” (complex piles of stones in Cumbrian boulder fields) which provided shelter for foxes from hunters, and these structures, which were traps.

It’s likely that a bait – a goose or hen- was attached to a plank balanced on one wall and reaching into the centre of the structure, held in place with a boulder. a fox approaching the bait would “spring” the trap, dislodging the plank and falling into the centre. The internally overhanging walls would prevent escape.

Research on these structures is scant, but there’s an excellent article by Sean Adcock on his Dry Stone web site: http://www.dry-stone.co.uk/Pages/Books/Articles/Article%20pdfs/General/StoneFoxTraps.pdf. This draws links to both Inuit fox traps and African Hyena traps.

Thanks to Jon Read for the intro, and the photo.

Loch Dochart – one of Duncan’s many castles

A small island on Loch Dochart is the site of one of the many castles built or acquired by Duncan, 7th Lord Glenorchy. The castle is visible from the main Crianlarich-Killin road, but despite its proximity is very inaccessible. Although the castle is only a hagbut-shot from the shore, reed beds and mud banks form a swampy barrier to its access.

A bathymetric survey of the loch in the early 20th centrury recorded an average depth of 5 feet, and noted that the loch was “very weedy”1. It certainly is today, and numerous sand banks and weed beds make navigating by boat to the island a challenge. A “can do” approach, and some careful observation of water flow means the landing area on the island can be reached with some difficulty by entering the loch via the channel leading upstream from the deeper and larger Loch Iubhair. Going is treacherous: in places the water is only a few centimetres clear of the weeds, and the mud beneath is at least a metre deep. The water flow, though gentle, pushes paddlers and rowers back towards Loch Iubhair and there’s a very real risk of grounding on mud that, while thick enough to stop a vessel, is soft enough for a disembarking paddler to sink in, at least waist deep. Some judicious if inelegant dragging on paddles can sometimes win through. On both visits to the loch in the summer of 2021, we were lucky to get through to the landing stage, and watched holidaymakers turn back as the weeds and mud threatened to ground their kayaks and rowing boats. Return trips proved easier as the flow of the water, and the channels through the mud, were more easily visible. The bathymetrical survey referenced above was conducted in April 1902, when the water level was possibly higher owing to spring rain and snow run-off coming down the River Fillan. It’s also possible that the loch has silted up further in the intervening 119 years.

The view east from the landing area

The extant building on the island features an impressive three storey chimney, that in recent times has obviously been the site of campfires.

The entrance to the castle with the chimney behind

Inside the chimney is a coat of arms of the Campbells of Glenorchy, featuring the Campbell birlinn and supported by two unicorns.

Glenorchy Coat of Arms

The castle was primarily a residence, but shows signs, as most houses of the period do, of defensive architecture such as arrow slits that doubled as loopholes for guns. There is also impressive buttressing surviving on the eastern wall of the house. The island commands views up and down Glen Dochart, and sits under the ominous presence of Ben More, which was managed as a deer forest by Duncan’s father, Colin, on behalf of the Carthusian Charterhouse in Perth prior to the Reformation2. The establishment of the castle symbolises the Glenorchy Campbells’ eastward expansion under Colin, the 6th Lord (1550-1583) and Duncan (1583-1631): as they extended their dominance in the area, they asserted their control with with visual lordly architecture at Loch Dochart, Finlarig (Killin), Edinample (on Loch Earn), and Balloch (later Taymouth, near Kenmore).

It is not clear when the castle was completed, but it was identified as a potentially useful stronghold by the earl of Argyll in 1639 in the preliminaries of the War of the Three Kingdoms3 and reportedly burned in 1646 by the MacNabs, after the clan sided with Montrose.

A hoard of 87 copper coins from the reign of Charles II were found at the site, presumably hidden well after the castle fell into disuse4.

The view west towards Crianlarich
Arrow slit/loophole accessed from within fireplace

A more recent development of interest to environmental historians is the clear evidence of beaver activity on the island.

References

  1. Murray and Pullar, Bathymetrical Survey of the Fresh-Water Lochs of Scotland, 1897-1909, Vol II, p74 – retrieved from https://maps.nls.uk/bathymetric/text/page/917
  2. Breadalbane Muniments, NRS, GD112/10/1/1/1
  3. Breadalbane Muniments, NRS, GD112/39/69/6
  4. Place, Mrs and Ross, T. (1906) ‘Notice of the exploration of the castle on the Isle of Loch Dochart, Perthshire’, Proc Soc Antiq Scot, vol. 40, 1905-6

The Breadalbane Muniments 1

bPMsp6ul (2)

Most of the source material for my research comes from a massive archive at the National Records Office in Edinburgh, the Breadalbane Muniments. These are the records of the now dormant house of Campbell of Breadalbane. The records are extensive, stretching from the Middle Ages to the twentieth century. The archive is understandably thinner in places – for example the mid seventeenth century – but overall this is a record that would occupy many lifetimes to fully explore.

Some of the archive has been transcribed and published – a sort of taster was prepared by Cosmo Innes in the “Black Book of Taymouth” which included a facsimile of a genealogy of the first seven lairds of Glenorchy, plus a sample of other material from the charter room at Taymouth Castle (the later seat of the Breadalbanes) in transcribed form, including examples of bonds of manrent, tacks, inventories and extracts from the court books of Discher and Toyer. This was published privately in 1855 and is available in the National Library of Scotland reading room and in various reproductions. Although the late Dr Alasdair Ross urged caution over Innes’ editorial approach, the Black Book is nonetheless widely cited by historians, and does offer those new to the period a sense of the style and language of Early Modern Scottish manuscript sources. (1)

Professor Jane Dawson edited a collection of letters from the muniments covering the period 1548- 1583, ending with the death of the sixth Lord Glenorchy, Grey Colin (Cailean Liath). This resource of 324 letters is available online as the Breadalbane Letters, along with helpful background and context.

The original documentary material -mainly manuscript, but including in later periods printed material – is an excellent source for hunting and poaching material. The Glenorchy Campbells had obtained lands in Breadalbane by complex and sometimes nefarious means, and ended up in possession of the Bailliary of Discher and Toyer, a franchise court which formed the basis of their baronial court from 1573 until 1748, when such heretable jurisdictions were abolished. (2) The surviving court books are a detailed record of estate management matters, inter-tenant dispute resolution and responses to petty (and not so petty) crime. The early books in particular include numerous cases of poaching, alongside encroachments on timber and other issues relating to (mis)use of natural resources. For a discussion of the utility of local court records, you might want to read an article originally published in Scottish Local History Issue 92, Autumn 2015, and also available from my Academia.edu pages.

The court record also throws up some unusual cases. Here’s an example from 1726 in which Donald McKimmy admits to giving Archibald McIntyre “two or three skelps upon the backside”, but claims he was provoked…

DSC_1127 two or three skelps

  1. Ross, Alasdair. “The Bannatyne Club and the Publication of Scottish Ecclesiastical Cartularies.” The Scottish Historical Review 85, no. 220 (2006): 202-30. Accessed January 30, 2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25529918.
  2. Martin MacGregor gives an excellent account of the Glenorchy Campbells’ expansion into Breadalbane, largely at the expense of MacGregors and MacNabs. MacGregor, Martin D.W. A Political History of the MacGregors before 1571 (1989). University of Edinburgh PhD Thesis. Accessed January 30, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/6887

‘Ane Quhyte Hynd’: Coireach a’ Bà

The Campbells of Glenorchy, like most great lairds in the Highlands, maintained deer forests for their ‘sport’. They were Royal foresters of Mamlorn, a large deer reserve on the mountains between Glen Lochay and Glenlyon in Breadalbane, where they acted, in theory at least, as stewards on behalf of the King. They also maintained a forest at Beinn Dorain, subject of the epic song, Moladh Beinn Dobhrain (In Praise of Beinn Dorain), by the earl of Breadalbane’s game herd, Duncan Ban MacIntyre (Donnchadh Bàn Mac an t-Saoir, 1724-1812). The Glenorchy lairds also maintained a forest at ‘Corrichiba’ (Coireach a’ Bà) in the area now occupied by the Blackmount deer forest. Unlike Mamlorn, Beinn Dorain and Coireach a’ Bà were private forests, in which the deer were preserved for the laird himself.

Black mount from Beinn Dorain
The Black Mount from Beinn Dorain, with Meall a Buiridh to the right and Stob a’ Choire Odhair to the left and Loch Tulla in the foreground

The forest at Coireach a’ Bà occupied a large corrie on the eastern slopes of the Black Mount range (Am Monadh Dubh) that includes the peaks of Stob a’ Choire Odhair, Stob Ghabhar and Creise/Clach Leathad. It is typical of the landscape features used as deer reserves: a large, relatively fertile and steep-sided corrie. Such locations were reserved as a place of safety for a deer herd, especially for hinds and calves. It opens to the west on to Rannoch Moor, passing the mound of Meall Tionall . To the north, east and south it is bounded by steep slopes, on the south side mainly cliffs. The lowest passage over the massif is at Bealach Fuar-Chathaidh (pass of the cold drifts) at almost 700m above sea level. It is an ideal place to corral deer ahead of a deer drive, the favoured method of hunting when mass, conspicuous display was required. The presence of an elevation named Meall Tionall (mound of assembly) concretely associates the location with deer hunting. This relatively common Gaelic place name indicates a location where deer were gathered for a drive.

Meall Tional and rannoch moor for web
Looking westwards from Coireach a’ Ba to Meall Tionall and the southern reaches of Rannoch Moor

Place names around the area give further indications of previous land use and vegetation cover. Bealach Fuar-Chathaidh can be approached from Glen Etive via a long path up the steep sided Coire Ghuibhasan. The name means corrie of the pines, but there are few in evidence today. However, all across the lower elevations of the corrie, eroded peat reveals bog pine: remnants of pine trees now overtaken by the peat. A systematic dating process has not been undertaken, but the reference to their presence in Gaelic suggests that trees were present in the early medieval period and its persistence points to a relatively recent demise of the trees.

Bog pine 1
Bog pine from Coire Ghuibhasan

It is possibly via this route that raiders came to Coireach a’ Bà in 1612 and 1613. A note from Glenorchy in 1613 documented four raids over the summers of 1612 and 1613, three undertaken by servants of Allan Cameron of Lochiel and the fourth directed by Ranald McRanald of Gargavich, who stayed in Dalness while his men took seventeen deer from the forest, and ‘ane quhyte hind'[1].

Blackmount 6
Map of the Black Mount area showing key locations mentioned in the text. © Crown Copyright and database rights 2019 Ordnance Survey (100025252)

A few years later in 1621 the Earl of Mar witnessed a white hind while on a hunt with Glenorchy. Perhaps there was a genetic predisposition within the herd: two white hinds within less than a decade. The Earl reported this curiosity to King James VI, a move he and Glenorchy were to regret. The King dispatched his English forester to capture the deer, disastrously underestimating the challenge of cornering and trapping alive a red deer in a highland setting. To add to the challenge, they attempted to do so in February. After much ado and great inconvenience to Lord Glenorchy, who was expected to entertain and facilitate the expedition, Scandaver, the forester, was forced to abandon his efforts when his party failed to navigate Rannoch Moor in winter conditions [2].

This post is the second of a series on Glenorchy’s deer reserves . The first is In the footsteps of Duncan Ban: deer, hunting and song in the Southern Highlands.

  1. National Records of Scotland, Breadlabane Muniments, GD112/39/23/9 and GD112/17/1/2
  2. Fergusson, J, The White Hind and other discoveries (Faber and Faber, London, 1963)

In the footsteps of Duncan Ban: deer, hunting and song in the Southern Highlands

(This article was first published with more extensive photographic material in Scottish Local History Issue 96)

Glenorchy and western Breadalbane were home to deer reserves policed by game herds and foresters in the employ of the Campbells of Glenorchy. This family established its hold over Breadalbane in the late sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, and their position as Royal Foresters of Mamlorn was an important element in their status in the region.  Mamlorn covered the area around Beinn Heasgarnich between Glen Lyon and Glen Lochay. Its heritable keeping was entrusted to Duncan of Glenorchy in the late 16th century.[i]  The family also controlled the hunting around what is now the Black Mount deer forest, including the great Coireach à Ba (the Corrie of the Cattle) which served as another game reserve.  These areas were home to herds of Red Deer that the Laird preserved for his and the King’s pleasure (though the monarchy rarely made it so far into the Highlands) and remained in Campbell hands until the nineteenth century.

The Campbells of Glenorchy employed numerous foresters and game herds to manage the land and game in these and other areas. One such forester has left a remarkable legacy of song inspired by his time in the hills of Breadalbane and the Black Mount. Duncan Ban MacIntyre (Donnchadh Bàn Mac an t-Saoir, 1724-1812), born in Glen Orchy, was, at various points in his life, a soldier, forester and city guardsman but first and foremost a lyricist. He is regarded by many as one of the foremost Gaelic bards of his age, and he has left a legacy of work that serves also as a historical resource. His most famous works relate to his time as a forester or gamekeeper, and provide valuable insights for historians of the area and of hunting in the period. Macintyre himself was illiterate. His work was first transcribed and published in 1768, and several editions of collected works followed, until the most recent collection with English translation in 1952.

He had a wide a varied career, encompassing service in the Hanoverian forces during the Jacobite rebellion of 1745-6, and periods of service in the Edinburgh militia. However, it was relatively early, as a forester in the service of the Earl of Breadalbane, that his professional and artistic life came to harmonious fruition in a series of compositions of which Moladh Beinn Dόbhrain (In Praise of Beinn Dorain) is the most substantial and deservedly well known.

His time as a forester came after his military service during which he saw action at Falkirk with the Argyll Militia. His experience of the battle was less than glorious and involved the loss of a sword which was a family heirloom of Archibald of Crannach. He commemorated the defeat (and the loss of the sword) in his song of the Battle of Falkirk (Oran Do Bhlar na h-Eaglise Brice).

Like many Gaels, he appears to have been at ambivalent about the Hanoverian cause, despite serving in the Government army. Amongst other things, he observed the assault on Gaelic culture that accompanied anti-Jacobite policy.  He composed a song to King George, but also a Song to the Breeches, (Oran Do ‘n Bhriogais) in which he bewailed the shortcomings of trousers compared to a plaid and tellingly, amongst the humour, declared:

‘S olc an seòl duinn am Prionns’ òg
A bhith fo mhóran duilichinn,
Is Rìgh Deòrsa a bhith chòmhnaidh
Far ´m bu choir dha tuineachas

Dire is our plight that the young Prince
Should be in great adversity,
and that, where he ought to be established,
King George should be the occupant.[ii]

In his later years he also wrote a second Song of the Battle of Falkirk, which again openly declared his Jacobite sympathies.

His career as a forester encompassed periods in Glen Lochay (watching the ancient forest of Mamlorn), Glen Auch (as forester of Beinn Dorain), Loch Tulla (in what is now the Black Mount deer forest) and also a period in the employ of Campbell of Argyll as forester in Glen Etive.

The position of forester was not primarily concerned with what would today be regarded as “forestry”, namely the care and maintenance of woodland for the extraction of timber. Rather, foresters in the seventeenth and eighteenth century were responsible for the care of areas of land that had been designated “forest” or wild land for a variety of purposes. The forester’s duties included the preservation of game, timber and underwood and the enforcement of local byelaws relating to land and natural resources.

Duncan’s heartfelt engagement with the life of the mountains, and his intimate understanding of their flora and fauna, especially in relation to hunting, are clear in his works. For environmental historians these songs are a rich and highly personalised account of the thoughts, feelings and activities of a Gael whose working life was bound up in the land and animals of Breadalbane and Glen Orchy.

His station at Ais-an t-sìthean (the place or haunt of the faeries) at the head of Glen Auch  inspired his masterwork, In Praise of Beinn Dorain (Moladh Beinn Dόbhrain). From this vantage point, he could survey most of the places mentioned in the song, which follows a herd of deer over the slopes of the mountain. With the exception of the Lament for the Misty Corrie, his ‘nature’ songs are celebratory, full of the richness of the environment, none more so than his Song of Summer and In Praise of Beinn Dorain. In the latter, he sings of the deer on Beinn Dorain:

’S annsa leam ’n uair théid
Iad air chrònanaich
Na na th’ ann an Eirinn
De cheòlmhoireachd

When they take to crooning,
I like it more
Than all there is in Eire
of harmonies[iii]

He is not, however, beyond killing these creatures whom he adores. Iain Crichton Smith argues that Macintyre’s poetic treatment of the deer is entirely pagan.  “Macintyre is not on the side of the deer morally. He loves them, he adores them. He has created them with marvellous fidelity and minuteness of detail”, yet later in the song, he shoots them and releases the hunting dogs that run down these beautiful creatures.   This, and other elements of the Macintyre’s work give insights into a world-view that may be “pagan” (as Crichton Smith argues), or might simply reflect an approach to animals and the natural world that had not yet been influenced by an Enlightenment rationalism. The attachment with and personification of the deer is almost erotic – he describes them as “curaideach”, which Crichton Smith translates as “coquettes”.  An intimate connection between hunter and prey is not uncommon in many hunting communities, nor is the association of hunting with a form of seduction. These associations suggest a world view different to the Western rationalism of today.[iv]

Macintyre also took pride in his skill as a hunter, and his works provide insights into the technology and techniques of eighteenth century. The finale of Moladh Beinn Dόbhrain describes a form of deer stalking: the pursuit of deer by a single stalker, with the objective of injuring a deer for the animal to be brought down by dogs. Macintyre describes the gun in meticulous detail, even down to the mechanism of the flintlock. The way he narrates the equipment and the technique of stalking speaks of a man who is not only celebrating the hunt, but is also demonstrating his own expertise. He is not, however, without the capacity for humility. His Song on a Hunting Fiasco (Oran Seachran Seilge) commemorates a day of failure on the hill after missing a deer with his shot:

’S mi teàrnadh a Coir’ a’ Cheathaich,
’S mόr mo mhìghean ’s mi gun aighear,
Siubhal frìthe ré an latha:
Thulg mi ’n spraigh nach d’ rinn feum dhomh.

As I descended from Misty Corrie,
great is my dudgeon, I am cheerless,
ranging forest all day long:
I fired the burst that gained me nothing.[v]

The same song also includes the revealing lines:

Ged tha bacadh air na h-armaibh
Ghléidh mi ’n Spàinteach chun na sealga

Though there is a ban on weapons,
I saved the Spanish gun for hunting[vi]

The Disarming Acts meant that firearms were indeed banned in the decades after Culloden, but presumably Macintyre felt safe enough to carry his sporting piece- perhaps with the earl of Breadalbane’s permission. It is also not clear whether Duncan was shooting deer for his own use or for the laird’s. It was common practice from the middle ages onwards that while elaborate hunts involving numerous horses and personnel were undertaken for entertainment, the provision of venison for lordly and royal tables was often left to expert servants who would use quick and efficient methods. It is likely that occasional hunting for the pot was tolerated from the foresters alongside their work to supply the table.

Duncan’s work is rich with references to guns, gunpowder and bullets, so much so that the intimacy with which he engages the animals of the mountain also extends to the means of their destruction. So attached was Duncan to his gun that he even composed a Song to a Gun Named Nic Coiseim (Oran do Ghunna Dh’ an Ainm Nic Coiseim), in which he says, despite his financial straits, he would never sell her:

Ged tha mi gann a stòras
Gu suidhe leis na pòitearan
ged théid mi do ’n taigh-òsda,
Chan òl mi ann an cuaich thu

Though I have scant resources
to sit down with the topers,
yet, though I go into the inn,
I will not drink thee in a cup.[vii]

Duncan’s work gives us a detailed picture of the work of a forester, or gamekeeper, beyond the business of walking the hills. Local politics that came into play: his Lament for the Misty Corrie (Cumha Coire A’ Cheathaich) is a bitter complaint about being ousted from the position of forester at Coire A’ Cheathaich (in the ancient forest of Mamlorn) in favour of a MacEwan who, he says, “is like a stone in lieu of cheese” (mar chlach and ionad càbaig). He catalogues the failings of his replacement: he has driven off the deer with his useless, rusty gun, and has left the woods to go to ruin and the burns have spoiled. This is of course hyperbole, and says more about Macintyre’s complaint than it does about the real business of managing a deer forest, though it does indicate the main areas of responsibility for a forester. Mamlorn was a Royal forest, meaning that the earl himself was, in effect, head forester for the king. Duncan makes reference to this when he concludes his litany of complaint:

Thig gach uile nì g’ a àbhaist,
Le aighear is le àbhachd
’N uair gheibh am baran bàirlinn
Siud fhàghail gun taing

All will revert to use and wont
with mirth and jubilation
when the baron gets a summons
to quit, and has no choice.[viii]

Despite his bitterness at his removal from Mamlorn, it was his subsequent station in Glen Auch that gave us Moladh Beinn Dòbhrain. This, and his other “nature” songs, represent an invaluable resource for the history of our relationship with the landscape and the plants and animals within it. The very personal nature of Macintyre’s descriptions, of hunting methods, landscapes and the animals that populate them, have left us with a detailed and varied picture of hunting and its management in the southern Highlands of the eighteenth century.

This was a period of transition. Older, personnel-intensive hunting methods such as deer drives and elaborate chases with dogs were in decline. Indeed by Duncan’s time, deer drives were a thing of the past. Stalking, originally with bows and later with guns, was a very old, less elaborate method. Duncan’s description of this style of hunting – an individual or small group shooting a deer and having the dogs pursue it – has echoes of poaching undertaken by the young lord of Glenlyon and his servants in the Mamlorn forest in the 1620s.[ix] This kind of hunting required intimate knowledge of the landscape, confident use of firearms, knowledge of animal behaviour and no small amount of luck.

Within Duncan’s lifetime, sheep ranching would come to oust older land use, and his Song to the Foxes (Oran Nam Balgairean) railed against the woolly invaders and congratulated the foxes for taking lambs. Beyond his lifetime, the Highlands would see the explosion of Victorian sporting tourism and, in turn, the development of new deer forests and “sporting estates”. In Duncan’s old stomping grounds the Black Mount deer forest would supplant the ancient game reserve based around Coireach a Bà (“Corrichiba” in many records) and after Duncan’s death the second Marquis of Breadalbane would successfully re-introduce the Capercaillie.

Duncan has documented through his songs an important chapter in the use of land and animal resources in the southern Highlands. What shines through at every turn is his intimacy and pride in his role and expertise as a forester. Perhaps it is best to leave the final word to him, again from Beinn Dorain:

Chan ‘eil muir no tir
A bheil tuilleadh brigh

‘S a tha feadh do chrich
Air a h-òrdachadh

There is neither sea nor land
that has more opulence
than is here disposed
within thy boundary. [x]

Notes and Further reading

This article is written by a historian, not a Gaelic specialist. The original works in Gaelic and their translations in this article are taken from Angus MacLeod’s 1952 edition and translation of all of Duncan Ban Macintyre’s published songs, with additional material from Iain Crichton Smith’s translation of Moladh Beinn Dòbhrain. More recently, Alan Riach has also translated the song.

John Murray, in his excellent guide to Gaelic toponymy, Reading the Gaelic Landscape: Leughadh Aghaidh Na Tire, has traced the route of the deer that Macintyre describes in Moladh Beinn Dòbhrain. This is an example of the intimate descriptive naming of the landscape common throughout the Gaidhealtachdt.

Angus Macleod, trans and ed, The Songs of Duncan Ban Macintyre, Sottish Gaelic Texts Society, Edinburgh, 1952

Alan Riach, trans, Praise of Ben Dorain, the original Gaelic text with an English translation, Kettillonia, 2013

Iain Crichton Smith, Duncan Ban Macintyre’s Ben Dorain, Northern House, Newcastle, 1969

John Murray, Reading the Gaelic Landscape: Leughadh Aghaidh Na Tire, Whittles, 2014

[i] National Records of Scotland, Breadalbane Muniments, MS GD112/59/3/1-5, 8

[ii] Donnchadh Bàn Mac an t-Saoir, ‘Oran Do ‘n Bhriogais’, in The Songs of Duncan Ban Macintyre, trans. and ed.  by  Angus Macleod, Sottish Gaelic Texts Society, Edinburgh, 1952, pp8-9

[iii] Donnchadh Bàn Mac an t-Saoir, ‘Moladh Beinn Dòbhrain’,  in The Songs of Duncan Ban Macintyre, trans. and ed.  by  Angus Macleod, Sottish Gaelic Texts Society, Edinburgh, 1952, pp202-203

[iv] Iain Crichton Smith, “Duncan Ban Macintyre’s Ben Dorain”, Northern House, Newcastle, 1969, pp6, pp12

[v] Donnchadh Bàn Mac an t-Saoir, ‘Oran Seachran Seilge’,  in The Songs of Duncan Ban Macintyre, trans. and ed.  by  Angus Macleod, Sottish Gaelic Texts Society, Edinburgh, 1952, pp156-157

[vi] ibid

[vii] Donnchadh Bàn Mac an t-Saoir, ‘Oran do Ghunna  Dh’an Ainm Nic Coiseim’,  in The Songs of Duncan Ban Macintyre, trans. and ed.  by  Angus Macleod, Sottish Gaelic Texts Society, Edinburgh, 1952, pp228-229

[viii] Donnchadh Bàn Mac an t-Saoir, ‘Cumha Coire A’ Cheathaich’,  in The Songs of Duncan Ban Macintyre, trans. and ed.  by  Angus Macleod, Sottish Gaelic Texts Society, Edinburgh, 1952, pp182-183

[ix] National Archives of Scotland, GD112/59/4/7-9, 12

[x]   Donnchadh Bàn Mac an t-Saoir, ‘Moladh Beinn Dòbhrain’,  in The Songs of Duncan Ban Macintyre, trans. and ed.  by  Angus Macleod, Sottish Gaelic Texts Society, Edinburgh, 1952, pp220-221